Dr. Christine Payer, Lead Counsel for IIoT at Dürr AG, presented an overview of these EU guidelines for digitalization at the VDMA European Summit 2026 in Rome—and shares the key takeaways in this interview: what’s changing for manufacturers, why “security by design” is more than a buzzword, and what implementation can look like using Dürr as an example.
Dr. Christine Payer: Because digitization is no longer just a “nice to have.” Any industrial company that wants to remain competitive has no choice but to adopt digitalized production processes. They drive efficiency, improve quality, help optimize energy use, and support more sustainable production. However, with every additional interface, every networked system, and every software component, the risk landscape also evolves. The attack surface is growing—across both IT and OT. Today, it is no longer enough to secure production systems simply by isolating them from the network. Attackers today operate with extreme sophistication and actively search for vulnerabilities within internal corporate systems.
Dr. Christine Payer: Exactly. Today, cyber incidents don’t just affect “IT systems.” They can disrupt production and safety, interrupt supply chains, and ultimately undermine trust. Cybersecurity is therefore a critical component of industrial resilience and corporate responsibility.
Dr. Christine Payer: It was intended to show how far-reaching cyberattacks have become. I referred to attacks at the end of December that affected wind and photovoltaic parks in Poland, while simultaneously targeting the operations of a manufacturing company. This demonstrates that cyberattacks are not ”distant threats” or confined to specific industries. The question is no longer whether you might be affected, but how well prepared you are.
Dr. Christine Payer: We are currently seeing a wave of regulatory activity: the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), NIS 2, the Machinery Regulation, the AI Act, and the implementation of the EU Data Act. A great deal needs to be implemented in a short period of time, placing significant pressure on companies-especially manufacturers.
And quite honestly: I seriously wonder how small and medium-sized enterprises are supposed to manage this at the required pace—considering how many components in a digitalized factory may fall under the scope of the CRA.
Dr. Christine Payer: No—and that’s an important point. At Dürr, cybersecurity has been firmly established across the entire organization for years. We have developed robust processes, including those based on IEC 62443, to provide customers with reliable solutions. However, cybersecurity is not a one-time effort. Dürr has established a central team that continuously monitors the threat landscape and supports customers in rapidly identifying and implementing solutions.
The CRA therefore requires consistent expansion of existing capabilities rather than a strategic overhaul. What is changing significantly, however, is the compliance dimension: It’s not just about technically implementing cybersecurity effectively, but about robustly demonstrating compliance with regulatory requirements and meeting all obligations in a structured way.
Dr. Christine Payer: We have established dedicated organizational structures and clearly defined responsibilities for this purpose. A group-wide team of experts—led by key individuals and supported by a steering committee—oversees the implementation of the CRA across the entire organization, including structured knowledge sharing across business units. At the same time, each business unit is responsible for implementing the requirements within its specific area, while the legal framework, interpretation of regulations, and the overall assessment are coordinated centrally. In addition, we have increased resources within our Product Security Development team and established a dedicated team to manage legally required reporting channels. Furthermore, we have set up a secure customer portal through which updates and information are provided.
Dr. Christine Payer: At Dürr, cybersecurity is not an “add-on,” but an integral component of both our corporate and product strategy. The CRA essentially confirms the direction we’ve been following for years.
Dr. Christine Payer: Because digital factories are only resilient if both sides are addressed properly. NIS‑2 focuses on organizational structures and operational processes — in other words, questions such as: Which systems are critical? How are processes protected? How are risks managed? This scope now extends beyond traditional IT to include OT environments with long‑established structures and legacy systems. Thus, NIS-2 addresses the organizational side of resilience, while the CRA focuses on the security of products and the supply chain. It serves as the critical interface with software suppliers, ensuring a uniform security standard throughout the entire software supply chain.
Dr. Christine Payer: When products are developed and delivered in compliance with the CRA, operators can meet their NIS‑2 requirements more easily — because a secure foundation is already “built in.” In this sense, secure products also strengthen overall organizational resilience. That is the essence of the “two sides of the same coin” I referred to in Rome.
Dr. Christine Payer: Yes. From a business perspective, the European legislator’s clear emphasis on strengthening cybersecurity is fundamentally positive. Dürr is well positioned with established standards, processes, and products, to meet these requirements — and to support customers in their secure digital transformation journey.